# 1 Cloud Hosting 在 中国

Cloud webhosting is Internet-based computing, where more resources, information and software are provided to computers and other devices on demand.

Details are abstracted from the users, who no longer have need for expertise in the technology infrastructure "in the cloud" that supports them. Cloud hosting describes a new supplement, consumption, and delivery model for IT services based on the Internet and it typically involves over the-Internet-provision of dynamically scalable and often virtualized resources.

我们选择市场上最好的 5 计划,因此您可以根据自己的需求决定选择哪一个!
公司Alibaba Cloud
alibabacloud.com 商标
总评价: 0
平均评分: 0 / 10
好评: 0
糟糕的评论: 0
官方回应: 0
west.cn 商标
总评价: 0
平均评分: 0 / 10
好评: 0
糟糕的评论: 0
官方回应: 0
xinnet.com 商标
总评价: 0
平均评分: 0 / 10
好评: 0
糟糕的评论: 0
官方回应: 0
bizcn.com 商标
总评价: 1
平均评分: 1 / 10
好评: 0
糟糕的评论: 1
官方回应: 0
22.cn 商标
总评价: 0
平均评分: 0 / 10
好评: 0
糟糕的评论: 0
官方回应: 0
价钱$ 5.90/月。
CNY 444.00/年。
CNY 48.20/月。
CNY 2.00/月。
CNY 104.00/月。
计划名称Cloud Web Hosting4 Cores 4 GB1 Core 1 GBCDS cloud diskEntry type




磁盘空间5 GB100 GB40 GB无限20 GB
带宽50 GB5 TB未计量未计量未计量
支付信用卡/借记卡/预付卡PayPal, 电汇信用卡/借记卡/预付卡信用卡/借记卡/预付卡信用卡/借记卡/预付卡
Control panel [室内]   
支持选项电子邮件, 服务台, 电话/免费电话, 在线聊天电子邮件, 服务台, 电话/免费电话, 在线聊天电子邮件, 服务台, 电话/免费电话电子邮件, 服务台, 电话/免费电话电子邮件, 服务台, 电话/免费电话
更新12月 201910月 201912月 201910月 201910月 2019


计划名称 产品类别 平台 磁盘空间 传递 记忆 价钱 托管网站 /
免费域名 / IP's
Dual-core 2 GB35.comLinux20 GB未计量2000 MBCNY 2,088.00/年。无限 / 0 / 0 6 12月, 2019
Telecom Standard Economycndns.comLinux150 MB10 GB CNY 59.00/年。无限 / 0 / 0 6 12月, 2019
1 core 2Ggzidc.comWindows30 GB未计量2000 MBCNY 237.00/月。无限 / 0 / 0 6 12月, 2019
New Almighty Cloud Virtual 1Gnow.cnLinux1 GB未计量 CNY 560.00/年。无限 / 0 / 0 7 12月, 2019
US cloud hostingiisp.comLinux无限未计量1000 MBCNY 250.00/月。无限 / 0 / 013 2月, 2020
Basic Editionzitian.cnLinux5 GB未计量1000 MBCNY 256.00/年。无限 / 0 / 014 2月, 2020
Cloud Virtual Host Pervasive—1Gzzy.cnLinux/Windows1 GB25 GB CNY 200.00/年。无限 / 0 / 014 2月, 2020
1 Core 4 GBqy.com.cnLinux50 GB SSD未计量4000 MBCNY 986.00/月。无限 / 0 / 019 2月, 2020
Entrepreneurship72e.netLinux/Windows80 GB未计量1000 MB$ 17.36/月。无限 1 12月, 2017
Entry-levelchinac.comLinux40 GB未计量2000 MBCNY 88.00/月。无限 / 0 / 028 2月, 2020
Dual-core 2 GBtodaynic.comLinux10 GB未计量20000 MBCNY 214.00/月。无限 / 0 / 019 2月, 2020
1C1G planbohan-it.comLinux50 GB未计量1000 MBCNY 800.00/年。 (CNY 2020 后 第一学期)无限 / 0 / 119 2月, 2020
Huaqi Cloud Server Abootchina.comWindows120 GB未计量2000 MBCNY 118.00/月。无限 / 0 / 015 2月, 2020
Business Connectivityiwv.worksLinux/Windows500 GB未计量 $ 245.00/月。无限 1 12月, 2019

关于 Cloud Hosting

Cloud HostingIn general, cloud hosting customers do not own the physical infrastructure, instead avoiding capital expenditure by renting usage from a third-party provider. They consume resources as a service and pay only for resources that they use. Many cloud webhosting offerings employ the utility computing model, which is analogous to how traditional utility services (such as electricity) are consumed, whereas others bill on a subscription basis. Sharing "perishable and intangible" computing power among multiple tenants can improve utilization rates, as servers are not unnecessarily left idle (which can reduce costs significantly while increasing the speed of application development). A side-effect of this approach is that overall computer usage rises dramatically, as customers do not have to engineer for peak load limits. In addition, "increased high-speed bandwidth" makes it possible to receive the same response times from centralized infrastructure at other sites.

Cloud computing sample architecture

Cloud architecture,the systems architecture of the software systems involved in the delivery of cloud computing, typically involves multiple cloud components communicating with each other over application programming interfaces, usually web services. This resembles the Unix philosophy of having multiple programs each doing one thing well and working together over universal interfaces. Complexity is controlled and the resulting systems are more manageable than their monolithic counterparts.

Cloud computing users can avoid capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware, software, and services when they pay a provider only for what they use. Consumption is usually billed on a utility (resources consumed, like electricity) or subscription (time-based, like a newspaper) basis with little or no upfront cost. Other benefits of this time sharing-style approach are low barriers to entry, shared infrastructure and costs, low management overhead, and immediate access to a broad range of applications. In general, users can terminate the contract at any time (thereby avoiding return on investment risk and uncertainty), and the services are often covered by service level agreements (SLAs) with financial penalties.

Although companies might be able to save on upfront capital expenditures, they might not save much and might actually pay more for operating expenses. In situations where the capital expense would be relatively small, or where the organization has more flexibility in their capital budget than their operating budget, the cloud model might not make great fiscal sense. Other factors impacting the scale of any potential cost savings include the efficiency of a company's data center as compared to the cloud vendor's, the company's existing operating costs, the level of adoption of cloud computing, and the type of functionality being hosted in the cloud.

Among the items that some cloud hosts charge for are instances (often with extra charges for high-memory or high-CPU instances); data transfer in and out; storage (measured by the GB-month); I/O requests; PUT requests and GET requests; IP addresses; and load balancing. In some cases, users can bid on instances, with pricing dependent on demand for available instances.

Key features

* Cost is claimed to be greatly reduced and capital expenditure is converted to operational expenditure. This ostensibly lowers barriers to entry, as infrastructure is typically provided by a third-party and does not need to be purchased for one-time or infrequent intensive computing tasks. Pricing on a utility computing basis is fine-grained with usage-based options and fewer IT skills are required for implementation (in-house).
* Device and location independence enable users to access systems using a web browser regardless of their location or what device they are using (e.g., PC, mobile). As infrastructure is off-site (typically provided by a third-party) and accessed via the Internet, users can connect from anywhere.
* Multi-tenancy enables sharing of resources and costs across a large pool of users thus allowing for:
- Centralization of infrastructure in locations with lower costs (such as real estate, electricity, etc.)
- Peak-load capacity increases (users need not engineer for highest possible load-levels)
- Utilization and efficiency improvements for systems that are often only 10 - 20% utilized.
* Agility improves with users' ability to rapidly and inexpensively re-provision technological infrastructure resources.
* Metering cloud computing resources usage should be measurable and should be metered per client and application on daily, weekly, monthly, and annual basis. This will enable clients on choosing the vendor cloud on cost and reliability (QoS).
* Scalability via dynamic ("on-demand") provisioning of resources on a fine-grained, self-service basis near real-time, without users having to engineer for peak loads. Performance is monitored, and consistent and loosely coupled architectures are constructed using web services as the system interface. One of the most important new methods for overcoming performance bottlenecks for a large class of applications is data parallel programming on a distributed data grid.
* Reliability is improved if multiple redundant sites are used, which makes well designed cloud computing suitable for business continuity and disaster recovery. Nonetheless, many major cloud computing services have suffered outages, and IT and business managers can at times do little when they are affected.
* Maintenance cloud computing applications are easier to maintain, since they don't have to be installed on each user's computer. They are easier to support and to improve since the changes reach the clients instantly.
* Security could improve due to centralization of data, increased security-focused resources, etc., but concerns can persist about loss of control over certain sensitive data, and the lack of security for stored kernels. Security is often as good as or better than under traditional systems, in part because providers are able to devote resources to solving security issues that many customers cannot afford. Providers typically log accesses, but accessing the audit logs themselves can be difficult or impossible. Furthermore, the complexity of security is greatly increased when data is distributed over a wider area and / or number of devices.

标签 Cloud Hosting

Autonomic computing Grid computing Peer-to-peer CapEx SLAs load balancing VPN PaaS Intercloud

Cloud Hosting 引用


twnic.net.tw 图标 Alexa163,494 - 2月 27, 2020 - 日本三菱電機遭多個駭侵團體同時大規模駭侵 - 日本最大製造業者三菱電機於星期一表示,該公司遭到駭侵團體大規模駭侵。 三菱電機在日本的國防與基礎設施工業領域, … 閱讀全文 日本三菱電機遭多個駭侵團體同時大規模駭侵 The post 日本三菱電機遭多個駭侵團體同時大規模駭侵 appeared first on 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心.

twnic.net.tw 图标 Alexa163,494 - 2月 27, 2020 - TikTok(抖音)App 存有多個資安漏洞,惡意軟體可透過簡訊傳遞給用戶、用戶個資亦有曝光風險 - 資安廠商發現抖音(TikTok)存有多個資安漏洞,對用戶造成相當嚴重的資安風險。 資安廠商 Check Poi … 閱讀全文 TikTok(抖音)App 存有多個資安漏洞,惡意軟體可透過簡訊傳遞給用戶、用戶個資亦有曝光風險 The post TikTok(抖音)App 存有多個資安漏洞,惡意軟體可透過簡訊傳遞給用戶、用戶個資亦有曝光風險 appeared first on 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心.
twnic.net.tw 图标 Alexa163,494 - 2月 27, 2020 - 行動網路正加速轉向IPv6 - 觀察北美主要行動電信業者在IPv6的進展可以發現,IPv6在北美已經逐漸被採用。一月中ARIN(America … 閱讀全文 行動網路正加速轉向IPv6 The post 行動網路正加速轉向IPv6 appeared first on 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心.

twnic.net.tw 图标 Alexa163,494 - 2月 27, 2020 - APRICOT 2020暨APNIC 49圓滿結束 - APNIC(Asia Pacific Network Information Centre )為掌管亞太地區I … 閱讀全文 APRICOT 2020暨APNIC 49圓滿結束 The post APRICOT 2020暨APNIC 49圓滿結束 appeared first on 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心.
twnic.net.tw 图标 Alexa163,494 - 2月 27, 2020 - 泛用型英文「. tw/.台灣」網域名稱加購優惠實施中 - 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(TWNIC)新推出泛用型英文「.台灣」網域名稱,有別於以往泛用型英文網域名稱只能使用 … 閱讀全文 泛用型英文「. tw/.台灣」網域名稱加購優惠實施中 The post 泛用型英文「. tw/.台灣」網域名稱加購優惠實施中 appeared first on 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心.