Apr, 2019 : New Google Algorithm May Update Page Ranking


todhost.com logo📅 - Google is up again with a new research paper which describes a dramatically new way to improve how web pages are ranked. This algorithm claims significant improvements to deep neural network algorithms that calculate relevance.

The new algorithm discusses a method of ranking web pages called, Groupwise Scoring Functions.

Without confirmation from Google we cannot know for certain if it is in use. But because significant improvements are claimed by the researchers, it may not be far-fetched to consider that this algorithm may already be in use by Google.

Does Google Use Published Algorithms?

Google has stated in the past that “Google research papers in general shouldn’t be assumed to be something that’s actually happening in search.”

Google rarely confirms which algorithms described in patents or research papers are in use. That is the case with this algorithm.

Is this Algorithm Part of the March 2019 Core Update?

This research paper shows how Google is focusing on understanding search queries and understanding what web pages are about. This is typical of recent Google research.

Google has recently introduced a broad core update that is reported to be among the biggest in years. Is this algorithm a part of that change? We don’t know and we will likely never know. Google rarely discusses specific algorithms.

It’s possible that something like this could be one part of a multi-part update of Google’s search ranking algorithm. It is not clear but is is unlikely to be the only one. The March 2019 Core Ranking Algorithm consists of a series of improvements.

Why this Algorithm is Important

The research paper begins by noting that machine learning algorithms label and give values to web pages individually, each web page in isolation from other web pages. Then the algorithms score the web pages in competition with the other web pages to find out which web page is most relevant.

Here’s how the research paper describes how current algorithms work:

“While in a classification or a regression setting a label or a value is assigned to each individual document, in a ranking setting we determine the relevance ordering of the entire input document list.”

The research paper then proposes that considering the age of all of the relevant web pages can give a clue as to what users want. So instead of ranking all the web pages one against the other, by reviewing the age of the web pages first, the ranking algorithm can better understand what a user wants and choose a better web page.

This is how the research paper describes the new algorithm:

“The majority of the existing learning-to-rank algorithms model such relativity at the loss level using pairwise or listwise loss functions. However, they are restricted to pointwise scoring functions, i.e., the relevance score of a document is computed based on the document itself, regardless of the other documents in the list.

…the relevance score of a document to a query is computed independently of the other documents in the list. This setting could be less optimal for ranking problems for multiple reasons.”

Cross-document Comparison

The research paper then shows how the current method of ranking web pages is missing an opportunity to improve the relevance of search results.

This is the example the research paper uses to illustrate the problem and the solution:

“Consider a search scenario where a user is searching for a name of a musical artist. If all the results returned by the query (e.g., calvin harris) are recent, the user may be interested in the latest news or tour information.

If, on the other hand, most of the query results are older (e.g., frank sinatra), it is more likely that the user wants to learn about artist discography or biography. Thus, the relevance of each document depends on the distribution of the whole list.”

In this example, the age of the web pages that are relevant to the search query can help to refine which answer is the best answer.

Modeling Human Behavior for Better Accuracy

The research paper then notes that search engine users tend to compare search results relative to other web pages. They then suggest that a ranking model that does the same thing is more accurate.

“…user interaction with search results shows strong comparison patterns. Prior research suggests that preference judgments by comparing a pair of documents are faster to obtain, and are more consistent than the absolute ratings.”

Also, better predictive capability is achieved when user actions are modeled in a relative fashion… These indicate that users compare the clicked document to its surrounding documents prior to a click, and a ranking model that uses the direct comparison mechanism can be more effective as it mimics the user behavior more faithfully.”

The New Algorithm Works

When considering algorithm research, it’s important to note whether the researchers stated that it improved and advanced the state of the art.

Some research papers note that the improvements are minimal and the cost of achieving these gains are significant (time and hardware). We consider less successful research to not be a good candidate for inclusion in Google’s search algorithms.

When a research paper reports significant improvements coupled to minimal cost, then in our opinion these kinds of algorithms have a higher likelihood of being included into Google’s algorithms.

The researchers concluded that this new method improves Deep Neural Network and tree-based models. In other words, this is useful. Google never says if an algorithm is used or how it is used. But knowing that an algorithm provides significant improvements and can scale improves the likelihood that the algorithm may be used by Google, if not currently then at some point in the future.

This is the value of knowing about information retrieval research. You can know what is possible. Understanding that something has not been studied is a strong clue that a theory about what Google is doing is not likely.

For example, correlation studies caused the SEO community to believe that Facebook likes were a ranking factor. But if those SEOs had bothered to read research papers they would have known that such a thing was highly unlikely.

In this case, the researchers state that this method is highly successful. In the following quote, please note that DNN means Deep Neural Networks. GSF means Groupwise Scoring Function.

Here is the conclusion:

“Experimental results show that GSFs significantly benefit several state-of-the-art DNN and tree-based models…”

How this Can Help Your SEO

Ranking in Google is increasingly less about traditional ranking factors. Twenty year old ranking factors like anchor text, heading tags, and links are decreasing in importance.

This research paper shows how considering commonalities between relevant pages may provide clues to what users want. Even if Google isn’t using this algorithm to rank web pages, the concept is still useful to you.

Knowing what users want can help you better understand the user’s information needs and to create web pages that better meets those needs.

And that may increase your ability to rank. Chase the carrot, not the stick.

Read the research paper here:
Learning Groupwise Scoring Functions Using Deep Neural Networks (PDF)

Googles March 2019 core update

It appears Google heard about the confusion with the namings of the broad core algorithm update from March 12 and decided to clear things up. Google said on Twitter, “Our name for this update is March 2019 Core Update.”

Why did Google name it? Google doesn’t often give names to updates but in this case, Google said, “We think this helps avoid confusion; it tells you the type of update it was and when it happened.” So Google named it the March 2019 Core Update, which they think will help avoid confusion.

Can Google change names of updates? Yes, they can and they have done so in the past. The original name we had for the Panda update was actually the Farmer update. Google didn’t like the name Farmer update and renamed it to the Panda update, which was based on the lead engineers last name.

So yes, Google has renamed updates in the past and they’ve stuck.

The tweet: Here is the tweet from Google earlier this morning with the new name:

Will it stick? Will the new name stick or will people still call it the Florida 2 update? It is hard to say but I suspect people will go with calling it what Google wants it to be called, the “March 2019 Core Update.”

How the Google Update of March 2019 Impacted Websites

Analysis shows that Google continues to fine-tune its search results for queries related to particularly sensitive topics. The March 2019 Google Core Update has had a large impact on websites.

While some websites have benefited from the update, several others have lost and their ranings have declined.

Google now values trust and branding

One clear trend resulting from this update seems to be Google favoring websites, particularly when users are searching for sensitive keywords, that are able to provide a higher level of trust. The main beneficiaries of this focus are websites with a strong brand profile and a broad topical focus. On the flipside, this has meant that niche websites dealing with these topics have seen their rankings fall.

Update Show User signals grow in importance

One key take away from this update show that Google’s algorithm has increased its weighting of user signals when calculating rankings. The results show that domains that improved their SEO Visibility following the Google Core Update have higher values for time on site and page views per visit, and lower bounce rates than their online competitors.

todhost.com Reads: 728 | Category: General | Source: WHTop : www.WHTop.com
URL source: https://www.todhost.com/announcements/70/New-Google-Algorithm-May-Update-Page-Ranking.html

Company: Tod Host

Want to add a website news or press release ? Just do it, it's free! Use add web hosting news!

Related news


📅 - SEO and Google News Update - May 2020 - 1. Bing can now answer queries with a simple ‘Yes’ or ‘No’
The yes/no summary uses natural-language modeling and comes with a carousel of sources.

Bing can now return a “Yes” or “No” answer for certain queries, the company announced Tuesday May 26, 2020. The new search feature includes the one-word answer as well as a carousel of related excerpts from various sources.

Certain queries will also trigger an option to refine the search for a more specific answer. Clicking on one of the refined search options takes you to the results for that query, which may also display the yes/no summary. This feature is currently live in the U.S. and will eventually expand to more markets.

2. Google ...
📅 - SEO and Google News Update - April 2020 - 1. You don't need as many visitors as possible



This is a mistake that many beginners make. It's a good idea to to get many website visitors. However, you need the right visitors.

Doubling the number of visitors usually does not double your sales. You need visitors that are interested in your offers. If people come through traffic exchange programs to your website, they won't buy. If you optimize your website for generic keywords that have a very high search volume, people won't buy. Better optimize for targeted keywords with fewer competitors.
How to save time:

Focus on the quality of the visitors. Avoid traffic sources that deliver untargeted traffic. Optimize your web pages for ...
📅 - Top Internet and Google News Update - March 2020 - Google: No Such Thing As Two Waves Of Indexing Or Crawling



We have heard Google talk about two waves ofindexing or crawling, espesially when it comes to processing JavaScript. But now Martin Splitt from Google says there is no such thing.

He did hint that it is going away but now says there was really no such thing.

Martin said in a JavaScript SEO hangout "First things first, there's no such thing as the second wave of crawling-ish." He added that by calling it that originally, it caused some issues. He said "The wave is an oversimplification that is coming back to us with interesting implications every now and then."

Google: We Don't Make Sites With Manual Actions Wait Longer For ...
📅 - Top Internet and Google News Update - February 2020 - 1. Google says you can host your website anywhere in the world



Google’s John Mueller said that Google does not prioritize crawling of websites that are hosted in the USA. You can host your website anywhere you want
John ✔ @JohnMu

Replying to @JohnMu and 3 others



Anyway, back to the original question, @visalvadayar , we don't prioritize crawling of sites in the US. Crawling internationally works fine, and the difference for search is minimal (the speed of light + network issues, essentially). Host your site where you want to host.


2. Google says most sites don’t have toxic links



Google’s John Mueller said that most websites do not have ‘toxic’ links. If they do, they ...
📅 - Top News and Updates From Google - Google releases September 2019 broad core algorithm update

Google has released quite a few ranking algorithm updates during the past few weeks. Have your rankings dropped? We can guide you on how to recover your rankings.

Normal fluctuations are not the same as ranking drops


The lower search results usually fluctuate much more than the top search results. If your website is new in the top 5 results, you can expect more fluctuation than websites that have been listed in the top 5 results for a longer time.

You can also expect higher fluctuation if the keywords are related to a hot topic. If Google shows results that are marked with "two hours ago", or "one day ago" then it's likely ...